Lawsuits Over “Organic” Cosmetics

Babyganics is now the last in a long line of cosmetic companies sued for false advertising over organic-type claims. Last month (Sept 2016) there were two suits filed against Babyganics, one for falsely advertising and implying their products are organic and one by a mom who alleged that her toddler sustained chemical burns from Babyganics tear-free shampoo.

I wrote a couple of years ago about organic cosmetics and the issues between the FDA and the USDA about whether or not cosmetics needed to comply with the USDA’s National Organic Program. It appeared then, and still appears now, that cosmetics don’t fall under the NOP regulations. There were several lawsuits filed against products that were marketed as “organic” but did not comply with the National Organic Program—generally those failed because the NOP regulations don’t apply to cosmetics.

False and Deceptive Marketing

However, that hasn’t stopped several litigants from filing suits for false and deceptive marketing practices. Their claims generally allege that the products imply by their name and marketing that they are “organic” (when they aren’t) and by virtue of those statements the companies are able to command higher prices for their products.

Here are a couple of examples:


KAS Direct LLC dba Babyganics was sued in September, 2016, in NY Federal Court for false marketing practices, including the name “Babyganic” implying their products are organic, statements that the products are organic or contain organic ingredients, and the fact that their “mineral-based” sunscreen actually contained synthetic ingredients. (Read the complaint.)


Jason® and Avalon Organics® Products


Hain Celestial Group, the company that markets Jason and Avalon Organics, was sued under a false advertising class action lawsuit in May 2011. Again, the complaint was based on the fact that false and deceptive claims of natural and organic ingredients cause consumers to pay more than they would have otherwise. The suit was filed in California and included allegations that their marketing was in violation of several sections of the California codes. (Read the complaint.)

The case was settled in February, 2016, with Hain agreeing to pay out $7.5 million cash and $1.85 million in coupons. (Read the approved settlement.)  Note that in November 2011, Avalon Organics DID get their products certified as Organic Personal Care Products under the NSF/ANSI 305 Organic Personal Care Products Standards.

Organix Products


In August, 2013 a complaint was filed against Todd Christopher International, Inc. dba Vogue International, the maker of Organix skin and hair care products. Among other things, the complaint pointed out that the US Patent and Trademark Office rejected the defendant’s trademark for the word “Organix” because the description was not limited to the description of goods to personal care products “comprised of primarily organic ingredients.” Ultimately Vogue International changed the USPTO application, but never changed the product formulations which were less than 10% organic.

The complaint also stated that the revenue from Organix products went from $9 million in 2007 (when the brand was introduced) to over $60 million through the first half of 2011, alleging that the meteoric rise was due to their marketing strategy to focus on (deceptive) organic positioning.

The plaintiffs claimed that prominently displaying the word “Organix” on the products and the ongoing practice of advertising, marketing, labeling, and/or representing the products as organic when they only contain a minimal amount of organic ingredients is likely to deceive ordinary consumers. (Read the complaint.)

In April, 2014, a a final settlement was approved. Vogue International agreed to cease using the Organix brand name and the word “organic” in its marketing of its hair care and skin care products, unless the products contain at least 70% organically produced ingredients. Second, they put $6.5 million into a Claim Fund, to be used to compensate members of the class action. (Read the Settlement Agreement.)

What Does it Mean?

While the USDA’s National Organic Program requirements apparently don’t technically apply to cosmetic products, that doesn’t mean that you can run amok claiming your products are “organic” when they aren’t.

Every state and the federal government have laws in place to protect consumers against unfair and deceptive marketing practices. In other words, you can’t claim to be selling one thing when you are actually selling something else—especially if what you are claiming makes your product more valuable.

You can’t claim a product is made of gold (and charge for it) when it is just gilt-painted lead.

You can’t claim a product is made of silk (and charge for it) when it is just cheap polyester.

And you can’t imply—by the name or outright claims—that your soap or cosmetic product is “organic” when it isn’t made of all (or mostly) organic ingredients.

If your trade, brand, or product name(s) contain the word organic or words that sound or look like organic you might want to reconsider (unless, of course, your product really is made from over 70% organic ingredients).

The lawsuits are already here. The laws and regulations directly addressing organic claims and implications on cosmetics are likely to come soon. It’s not a very wise business move to center your marketing around something that could be deemed deceptive or to invest time and resources into marketing and promoting trade, brand, or product names that you will have to change down the road.

Navigating the Rules and Regs book by Marie Gale

Besides labeling, there are many other laws and regulations that apply to handcrafters. To find out which ones apply to you and how to comply with them, buy my book and keep it handy!


13 responses to “Lawsuits Over “Organic” Cosmetics”

  1. Is it true that even if you have the USDA organic seal on your cosmetic products, you can still be sued by a consumer/company validating it is not organic?

    1. In this country, anyone can sue anyone, so you COULD still be sued if you have an organic seal on the product. If you are complying with the national Organic Program and using the Organic Seal correctly, the chances of a suit are probably less, but it doesn’t prohibit someone from suing you.

  2. Connie Dobbs

    To be clear:

    “Cosmetic products labeled with organic claims MUST (caps mine) comply with both USDA regulations for the organic claim and FDA regulations for labeling and safety requirements for cosmetics. ”

    1. Marie Gale

      That’s correct. If it is an outright claim of “organic” or uses the organic seal, then it must comply with the USDA certification program. Products that are NAMED “____ Organics” or “Organix” or other names that IMPLY an organic product by virtue of the name of the product or the company are in a gray area (about which the lawsuits have been underway).

  3. Sharon Carter

    Marie, your books are wonderful, if anyone hasn’t purchased them I highly recommend them. The use of colors is confusing. I currently am starting my business with body butters, sugar scrubs and lip balms. I have been testing a strawberry lemonade lip balm using ground freeze dried strawberries as the flavor. I plan to keep all of my products 100% natural. The strawberries leave a particle suspension which I hide with lip safe mica. Is the strawberry considered color? If so is it illegal to use it? What if I choose to add dried herbs to my sugar scrubs?

    1. Marie Gale

      If the color imparted by the herb is significant to the marketability and “consumer acceptance” of the product, then it is a color additive. If the ingredient is there for some other purpose than color AND any color it imparts is “clearly unimportant” (which means that you could sell it the same if that color wasn’t there), then it’s okay.

      As an aside, do be sure that you do preservative testing if you are using freeze dried strawberries. Once they get wet, (through condensation, humectant qualities of the product or just touching the lips) you have a situation that is ripe for bacteria to grow.

  4. HI MARIE,



    1. Marie Gale

      You might want to reconsider your brand name. I expect that over time the use of “organics” in the name of a product or brand name will cause an issue if the products aren’t actually organic.

  5. Hi Marie:

    Boy, I went to the FDA government site and it is overwhelming. How can anyone expect someone to read all of that fine print. I am going to get your book and hopefully, it will be a guide for me to keep in mind. How does one know that when they are purchasing oxides, micas, that they are approved? That kind of bothers me.

    I just made a soap that includes Activated Charcoal and is it ok to say that it draws out impurities and that it is like a detox of sorts. Please advise


    1. There isn’t anything that I know of that says you can’t use Activated Charcoal in your products, but you can’t CLAIM that it will draw out impurities because that is changing the function or structure of the body, thus making the product a drug under the eyes of the FDA.

  6. I did a lot of reading on using the symbol that says in some form “made with organic ingredients” and thought you still had to be certified to use it, this with regards to personal care products. I have seen this symbol on a locally made product and the website says they are NOT certified. It’s my understanding use of such symbols without being certified can carry a fine of up to $11,000. Can you clarify, because I do believe it is being used as a marketing tool.

    1. Marie Gale

      “Organic” claims for cosmetic products are iffy. You CAN claim that the product is “made with organic ingredients” (provided it’s true) and can state the percentage of organic ingredients. That’s for sure. When it comes to implying that the PRODUCT is organic (either by saying so directly or by the name or the product or company), then it gets iffy. The USDA National Organic Program technically doesn’t apply to cosmetics (unless the company applies to be certified under the USDA NOP). However, there have been (and probably still are) lawsuits over the unfairness of the regulations applying to foods but not cosmetics.

      Just be wary of what claims you make.

  7. Jackie Thompson

    I’ve been using Organix shampoo for years. After reading this post, I checked the label and it now reads Ogx. I didn’t even notice the name change….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *